Table of Contents

gāo zhìliàng fāzhǎn: 高质量发展 - High-quality Development

Quick Summary

Core Meaning

Character Breakdown

The characters combine logically. `质量 (zhìliàng)` is the standard word for “quality.” `发展 (fāzhǎn)` is the standard word for “development.” Adding `高 (gāo)` at the beginning simply means “high quality.” So, the term is a very direct “high-quality development,” but its meaning is loaded with political and economic significance.

Cultural Context and Significance

高质量发展 is one of the most important concepts of the “Xi Jinping Era.” It represents a fundamental break from the “growth-at-all-costs” model that defined the previous 30-40 years of China's “Reform and Opening Up” (改革开放). Historically, the focus was on rapidly increasing GDP to lift hundreds of millions out of poverty. The new approach acknowledges that this old model has reached its limits, leading to severe environmental damage, resource depletion, and growing social imbalances.

This term reflects a shift in national values from pure material wealth accumulation to a more holistic vision of a strong, harmonious, and beautiful China (美丽中国).

Practical Usage in Modern China

This is a formal and official term. You will encounter it constantly in specific contexts:

Its connotation is overwhelmingly positive and aspirational. It's presented as the only viable path forward for China.

Example Sentences

Nuances and Common Mistakes

A common mistake for learners is to think 高质量发展 just means “making high-quality products.” While that's part of it, the term refers to the entire macro-economic and social system.

As mentioned earlier, it's similar to “sustainable development” but not identical. 高质量发展 has a stronger emphasis on state control, technological sovereignty, and national industrial power. To a Chinese policy-maker, achieving tech independence from the West is a crucial part of “high-quality,” which is not necessarily a core component of “sustainability” in its Western usage.

This is a formal, top-level term. Using it in casual, everyday situations would sound strange or even sarcastic. It's for discussing the economy, policy, and national strategy, not for describing your workout or a meal.